assigning_assessed_state

Template:— assigning_assessed_state (asg_asd_state)
Capability:representing_state_observed

Date: 2008/02/20 08:05:00
Revision: 1.16

Cover Contents Description Model diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation path Instance diags.Characterizations Issues in situ

Issue raised against: assigning_assessed_state

GENERAL issues

Issue: SBH-1 by Brad Harris (07-01-04) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Instantiation of entity state_assertion is mandatory. However, when the symptoms of a state are observed, for example abnormal noise, temperatue or vibration of an engine, the definition of the state that is causing the symptoms may not be known. Either:

The entity instatiation needs be made optional.
The description of the template needs to make it clear that the reference data associated with state_definition will include generic state_definition classes that correspond to possible symptoms of various states. These generic state_definition classes need to be defined and described in an equipment independent manner.

If the second option is chosen as the resolution, the reference data needs to be created.

Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-04-23)
The symptom should be represented by an observation. See the DEX aviation_maintenance dex for an example

Issue: SBH-2 by Brad Harris (07-01-04) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The characterizations that use assigning_calendar_date template are not sufficient for some applications, where the time of the observation of the state is also important. The use of the assigning_time template would be resolve this issue and not detract from what currently exists.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 07-04-23)
amended

Issue: SBH-3 by Brad Harris (07-01-04) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The template is not mandatorily characterized by the assigning_identification template. There are requirements to be able to reference, for example, a state_observed related to a product_as_realized, as being the reason for performing a repair activity. If no identification is specified for the state_observed, can this referencing still be achieved ?

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 07-04-23)
amended

Issue: GYL-1 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 4: Figure 3 ‘Entities instantiated’ is to large to fit within an A4 printout.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-2 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 6: Master-files are not defined for most of the figures.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
added

Issue: GYL-3 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 8: Names of editable files are not in accordance with approved guidelines.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-4 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 14: Some references under the characterization section are not hyperlinked. E.g. person.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
all relevant rreferences hyperlinked

Issue: GYL-5 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review items nr 26 and 41: The EXPRESS-G diagram does not conform with AP239 ARM:

The select ‘state_of_item’ shall be an EXTENSIBLE SELECT.
State_observed inherits from the entity ‘State’. This is not shown.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-6 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 28: There are many templates included in the EXPRESS-G diagram which are just characterizations.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-7 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review items nr 29, 30 and 50: The ‘assigned_to’ parameter is not shown in the EXPRESS-G diagram.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-8 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 38: Attribute name for the template assigning_ reference_data is not close to the arrow.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-9 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review items nr 42, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48: Abbreviated template is missing.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
added

Issue: GYL-10 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 68: The ‘id’ input parameter for template instance @6 is not consistent.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-11 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 70: Entities and templates provided as examples are not shaded grey. This is the case for both the Express instantiation diagram and for the Template instantiation diagram.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
amended

Issue: GYL-12 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 71: There are many templates included in the EXPRESS instance diagram which are just characterizations.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
additional templates add to clarification of template and do not detract from meaning

Issue: GYL-13 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 88: Add uniqueness constraint. There shall only be one instance of an entity State_definition associated with an instance of a specific reference data class.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
added

Issue: GYL-14 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-12-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Review issue. Review item nr 90: Reading the characterization diagrams gives you the impression that the explicitly defined assignments of ‘times’ and ‘person_in_ organizations’ are the only valid ones.

Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-03)
wording amended