Template:— product_design (prd_des)
Context:— UK_Defence
Date: 2009/10/28 17:11:54
Revision: 1.4

Issue raised against: product_design

GENERAL issues


Open issue Issue: TR-01 by TrishaRollo (2008-10-10) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

figure 2 and 3 missing relationship to product specification
Comment: ( )
..(comment text goes here)..

GENERAL issues


Closed issue Issue: MWD-1 by Mike Ward (2008-08-08) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

If the iod_view parameter of the underlying item_of_design template (i.e. the reference data assignment for item) is truly optional, this should be a characterization. If this is really mandatory, the template can remain as it is except that the "optional" attribute should be reset to "no". Simillarly, the optional attribute of product_design.type should be set to "no" or this parameter should be removed.
Comment: (Tim Turner 2008-10-02)
Corrected former to mandatory and latter to no


Closed issue Issue: MWD-2 by Mike Ward (2008-08-08) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

If the conforms_with attribute is optional, it should be representated as a characterization.
Comment: (Tim Turner 2008-10-02)
Removed to characterization bucket.


Closed issue Issue: MWD-3 by Mike Ward (2008-08-08) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Characterizations that do not correspond to anything in the CBIS model should be removed.
Comment: (Tim Turner 2008-10-02)
Assigning_date_effectivity removed.


Closed issue Issue: MWD-4 by Mike Ward (2008-08-08) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The related_design attribute is not in the CBIS model. If it is required, it should be added to the CBIS model and representated as a characterization in the template.
Comment: (Tim Turner 2008-10-02)
Asked/argued for it numerous times, but still not present so removed.