Template:— message (msg)
Context:— UK_Defence
Date: 2010/03/22 12:23:19
Revision: 1.4

Issue raised against: message

GENERAL issues


Open issue Issue: TJT-15 by Tim Turner (2008-10-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Template in characterization Fig 6 for Sender should be the UK_Defence.Organization not PLCS assigning_organization, to be consistent with documentation below.


Open issue Issue: TJT-16 by Tim Turner (2008-10-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Template input parameter is of EXPRESS type 'File' which is not in the select type list message_content_item and is thus illegal. Solution would be to change File to Document.


Open issue Issue: TJT-17 by Tim Turner (2008-10-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

CBIS Recipients attribute indicates that there may be more than one person/orgs that receive the message. However, the template only seems to allow for one and is therefore inconsistent. Suggest change to CBIS or update template?


Open issue Issue: TJT-18 by Tim Turner (2008-10-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

CBIS Recipients attribute indicates a choice of recipiant. However, the template only seems to allow for one and is therefore inconsistent. Suggest change to CBIS or add a note to the template?


Open issue Issue: TJT-19 by Tim Turner (2008-10-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Fig 2 shows an mis-placed parameter - Message.Subject - that belongs in characterization.


Open issue Issue: TJT-20 by Tim Turner (2008-10-02) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Instantiation path for Recipient should be use UK_Defence.Organization template call - not PLCS assigning_organization template.

GENERAL issues


Closed issue Issue: TJT-01 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

According to the CBIS model (4.0.1) and the business object table, Message.Content is supposed to be of type Record, not Activity_actual. Either CBIS or the template vn 1.23 is incorrect.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
Record template didn't exist when this template was created. Changed to include.


Closed issue Issue: TJT-02 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

According to the CBIS model and the business object table, Message.Content is supposed to be optional, but appears as mandatory in Fig2. Either CBIS or the template is incorrect.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
CBIS changed


Closed issue Issue: TJT-03 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

According to the CBIS model for Message, the attributes Subject, Subject and Type are missing from Table above fig 2.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
presume Subject, Subject and Type should read Sender, Subject and Type. Added.


Closed issue Issue: TJT-04 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

According to the CBIS model the attributes Subject is optional (person or Organization) but appears in Fig2 and Fig 6. As an optional they should both be in Fig 6, or CBIS needs changing.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
removed from fig 2


Closed issue Issue: TJT-05 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The object attributes for ID are missing from Table above fig 2. This is important since there is a Type attribute within Identifier, but also within Message and the two need to be distinguished.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
ID attributes are within representing_message


Closed issue Issue: TJT-06 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Message template path is possibly inaccurate as it creates two instances of the entity message.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
moved reference parameter


Closed issue Issue: TJT-06 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Message template path is possibly inaccurate as it creates four instances of the entity contract.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
moved reference parameter


Closed issue Issue: TJT-07 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Record is not an attribute of the CBIS Message object, yet appears in characterization.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
Record is referenced from contents. Now mandatory; removed from characterization


Closed issue Issue: TJT-08 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The message template uses assigning_descriptor with a classification set to 'purpose' in the path, however this doesn't appear to be in UK_Defence rdl. This may be a problem with the RDL configuration.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
in RDL


Closed issue Issue: TJT-09 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Fig 2 - at least the main template (representing_message) should show the input parameters. The ref parameter inside the template box for the main template should be removed.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
diagram to agreement


Closed issue Issue: TJT-10 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Fig 4 - the figure should show the relationship to the contents of the message (using grey box as required to indicate the content (instance #266) is defined outside the template). Else this figure is inconsistent with the example template call given above..
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
changed


Closed issue Issue: TJT-11 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The message template uses assigning_security_classification with a classification set to 'secret' in the examples, however this doesn't appear to be in UK_Defence rdl. This may be a problem with the RDL configuration.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
changed to rdl.std


Closed issue Issue: TJT-12 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Subject and type attributes are missing from Fig 6.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
added


Closed issue Issue: TJT-13 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The ref param for contract need not be shown in Fig 6.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
removed


Closed issue Issue: TJT-14 by Tim Turner (2008-09-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

According to CBIS the Activity_actual shown in Fig 6 should be the UK_Defence Record object.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-09-25)
changed