| Template:— representing_work_done (rep_wrk_done) Capability:representing_work_done  | 
            Date: 2008/01/18 08:58:19  Revision: 1.30  | 
         
               Issue:
               GYL-1 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-05-04) major_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
The templates should stay as there is a real difference between: - authorized work done to a product, Template_ref name="representing_work_done" capability="representing_activity" - activities performed by a product, Template_ref name="representing_product_usage" capability="representing_activity" - and activities that have occurred with not authorized directed_activity Template_ref name="representing_activity_actual" capability="representing_activity". The introduction to all three templates have been reworded to explain the differences.
               Issue:
               RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (07-10-31) minor_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-10-31)
Addressed
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-13 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
corrected
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-14 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-15 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected
               Issue:
               EPM- by ,  (undefined) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-16 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
This is allowable and an XSLT issue
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-17 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) major_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
See GYL-1
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-18 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) major_technical issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
See GYL-1
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-19 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
rephrased introduction
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-20 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
The convention is that there should be a separate characterization diagram showing the optional templates. this has been added.
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-21 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-22 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-23 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
added
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-24 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Changed diagram and short_name
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-25 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
They should not be - they are characterizations
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-26 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-02)
All classes are present
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-27 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
The correct URN has been used urn:plcs:rdl:std
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-28 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Trisha Rollo 07-12-31)
Missing data added
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-29 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected P21 layout
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-30 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
It has "Unique activity actual"
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-31 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
The unique entity is Activity_actual which is referenced by %^actual_work = Activity_actual%
               Issue:
               EPM-RI-32 by JH, EPMT (2007-12-5) editorial issue Comment: (Trisha Rollo 07-12-31)
corrected