Template:— representing_organizational_location (rep_org_locn)
Capability:representing_location		 Date: 2005/08/15 08:20:35 :
Revision: 1.11
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssuesin situ

Issue raised against: representing_organizational_location

GENERAL issues

Open issue Issue: TJT-1 by Tim Turner, LSC (04/09/2007) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Parse error by Graphical Instance vn 1.0.5.20; Element content is invalid according to the DTD/Schema. Expecting: template_example at line 183: See figure id="representing_org_location_inst.png"

Open issue Issue: DNV-3 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: General#7 The checklist requires files to be in the dvlp directory. This seems systematically not to be the case. Is the checklist wrong?

Open issue Issue: DNV-17 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: General#5 The naming of the files is not as required.

Open issue Issue: DNV-18 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: XML#9 In Instance diagram the following is used: "'Organiation_name'". Close to the end there is this: "... instance of for each one superfluous." Also at the end: "The identifier type should be " shall use "shall".

Open issue Issue: DNV-19 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: XML#14 The "Type" of the parameters could be hyperlinked.

Open issue Issue: DNV-20 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Cover#19 Names of reviewers are only given as company names.

Open issue Issue: DNV-21 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Cover#20 Current status is "in_model_review"

Open issue Issue: DNV-22 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Cover#22 Location_assignment should e.g. be mentioned in this template * if just in an example.

Open issue Issue: DNV-23 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Description#24 It is rather brief and would gain a lot by examples. The matter of assigning the location should be covered. Also, the optional characterizations should be mentioned here already.

Open issue Issue: DNV-24 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Description#25 No restrictions are given. It should be stated that organizational locations can not be represented as reference data. The "recommended" restriction for Organizational_location_identification should be documented as a "required" restriction.

Open issue Issue: DNV-25 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Model diagram#36 That the required class-names are not included in the boxes seem right, as subclasses are allowed. Here, however, the superclass names are added elsewhere on the diagram. Is that right?

Open issue Issue: DNV-26 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Model diagram#37 No RDL URN is given at all.

Open issue Issue: DNV-27 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Input parameters#51 Yes, but there is a copy/paste error: st_date_class_name is referenced, but is not in this template.

Open issue Issue: DNV-28 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Input parameters#51 "University of Life" I do not understand in: "org_name(Default=University of Life,Type='STRING')" There can not be a default-value here?!

Open issue Issue: DNV-29 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Input parameters#51 Same as above with loc_val.

Open issue Issue: DNV-30 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Reference parameters#57 Shouldn't the definition of the type be consistent with how it is defined in the input parameter section. I would have expected the following: organization(Type='ENTITY(Organization)'))

Open issue Issue: DNV-31 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instantiation path#63 Statements like "items=Organization" seem to be missing the ^-sign!?

Open issue Issue: DNV-32 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#72 Organization.id has no value ($). It is optional, but shall it no anyhow be assigned '/IGNORE'?

Open issue Issue: DNV-33 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#73 A couple use urn:plcs:rdl:std * maybe this is correct here?

Open issue Issue: DNV-34 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#75 No bold here.

Open issue Issue: DNV-35 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#79 The attribute names are: items[0]. Why zero? The first element in a set has the index 1.

Open issue Issue: DNV-36 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#82 Spelling error in figure 4: Organiation_name

Open issue Issue: DNV-37 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#84 No bold here.

Open issue Issue: DNV-38 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Characterization#90 Class_name is not within the box, but outside. The old spelling error in @1. std-RDL, not sample-RDL. Why is Configuration capitalized in the caption of figure 5?

Open issue Issue: DNV-39 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Check list clause: Characterization#91 The Note requires one specific class. Early subclasses were allowed as well! This maybe implicitly included here, but might be misunderstood by less precise thinking readers. Same in paragraph for "Organization".

Open issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (08-01-24) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

The default to the input parameters loc_val and org_name is incorrect org_name (Default=University of Life,Type='STRING') loc_val (Default=e.g. Room 101 in the administration building of the University.,Type='STRING') Also: org_name_class (Default=urn:plcs:rdl:std, It should not be a URN - but a class name