Template:— representing_activity_actual (rep_act_act)
Capability:representing_activity		 Date: 2008/01/18 08:58:19
Revision: 1.29
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssuesin situ

Issue raised against: representing_activity_actual

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: GYL-1 by Leif Gyllstrom (2007-05-04) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

The description says :"It is mandatory to assign an identifier or name to the activity ..... " I would have thought that in situations where the actual_activity is the record for an "planned" Activity then the identifier assigned to the Activity would be enough.
Comment: (Peter Bergström 2007-05-17)
Well, nothing stops you from using the same name or identifier, as long as your business rules does not prohibits this. However, this template does not force the use of Activity_happening, so the link to a planned activity is not guaranteed. In my opinion, the name (at least) of the Activity_actual should be present.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Furthermore, there may be situations where there are several actual_activities as a result of a single planned activity.

Closed issue Issue: EPM-15 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: representing_activity_actual_tmpl.vsd is missing
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-16 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Missing files in the dvlp directory.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-17 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: Cover page gives warnings in Firefox. Internet Explorer gives no errors but has bad performance.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
This is an XSLT issue. Firefox does not support the XML/XSLT

Closed issue Issue: EPM-18 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Figures are referenced as "below", not always with a number and link.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
This is an XSLT issue that has been resolved.

Closed issue Issue: EPM-19 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: State is not in textual description of characterization.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-19)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-20 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: Some of the optional templates have no parameters listed.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 07-12-20)
The parameter of a template that is optional in this template are listed when the (optional) template is defined.

Closed issue Issue: EPM-21 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Chosen_method should be on activity in the Express-G diagram.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-22 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Repr used for short form, should be "rep".
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-23 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Attribute name not used when showing the assignment arrows for the template.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 07-12-20)
Added

Closed issue Issue: EPM-24 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Template reference parameters are shown below in the Express-G diagram.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-25 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: ENUMERATION is used as a type of parameter.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
This is acceptable

Closed issue Issue: EPM-26 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: The type declaration should be "ENTITY" for reference parameters?
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
The reference parameter is correct

Closed issue Issue: EPM-27 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: The textual example is not consistent with the instantiation diagram. Sense="Exact" id_owner='ExpressDeliveryInc'
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-18)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: EPM-28 by Nicolai Friis, EPMT (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Description of assigning state is missing in the characterization.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-19)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: MWD-01 by Mike Ward, Eurostep Limited (undefined) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Date_actual_start is mandatory. This makes it impossible to plan an actual activity since the actual start date can only be known for certain retrospectively.
Comment: (Mike Ward 2008-05-19)
This problem is dealt with in PLCS through the use of two separate templates for planned activities and activities that have actually begun.