Template:— assigning_justification (asg_just)
Capability:representing_justification		 Date: 2010/03/10 10:15:12
Revision: 1.16
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssuesin situ

Issue raised against: assigning_justification

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-1 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

XML figure tags do not identify the master in dvlp.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
Added master to figures

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-2 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The source files in dvlp are incomlete.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
The express-g diagrams are in one file

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-3 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Further is spelled "furter" in the model diagrams section
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
corrected

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-4 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The opening sentence of the description is not clear, and should included a description of what a justification is, not just an example. The module repository states "A Justification is the identification and description of the reasons for something."- that might be worth including. I don't understand the phrase "prize concession". The second paragraph seems to imply a justification is used solely in the context of divergences or concessions. For (counter) example, the justification may describe the reason why a particular task is required - particularly since PLCS does not current cover the LSA (Logistic support analysis).
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
Improved text

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-5 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The abbreviation "Just" - it might be clearer if "jstf" were used, as this is not an English word
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-6 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Parameter description: Just_txt is inadequate - currently it says that a description is a text string. The question is, what is the description supposed to say?
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
Updated text

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-7 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Parameter description: To describe just_asgn_role as "The type of Justification_assignment" is inadequate.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
Improved text

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-8 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

In Instantiation path, I think the work "referable" is used more for causal relationships, I think referencable would be better.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
corrected

Closed issue Issue: SB-PreReview-9 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The comments at the end of the instantiation path are not appropriate for publication, though they could be left as comments internal to the XML. Note, however, the in this context document is just being used as an entity to hold a description - this has been superseded in STEPMOD by description_assignment, but too late for PLCS. The reference to identifiable documents should be through Justification_support_item.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-14)
Removed comment

Closed issue Issue: SB-Review-10 by Sean Barker (2007-10-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

In the characterization section, the characterization by reference data is not described.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 2008-01-22)
amended

Closed issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (08-02-27) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Justification_assignment has a reference parameter called just_asgn, but in the path it is referred to as just_assgn.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-02-27)
Correcetd