Template:— assigning_domain_specific_effectivity (asg_domain_spec_eff)
Capability:assigning_effectivity
[warning:]The use of this template is deprecated. (2008-02-08)
Date: 2008/05/14 17:05:43
Revision: 1.11

Issue raised against: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity

GENERAL issues


Open issue Issue: DNV-14 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 6 The inst_tmpl master specification contains double underscore


Open issue Issue: DNV-15 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 10 Two errors in instanciation path: Error T7: assigning_effectivity does not exist. Error T1. assigning_effecitivy does not exist


Open issue Issue: DNV-16 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 14 No occurrences of template_ref, missing link to assigning_effectivity. No occurences of rdl_ref. Missing link to Effectivity_domain (used in diagram) and to Effectivity (used in parameter)


Open issue Issue: DNV-17 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 16 No occurences of figure_ref in template.xml


Open issue Issue: DNV-18 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 18 The assigning_effectivity capability talks about domain of applicability, i.e. an asg_eff defines the applicability domain of a set of entities. However, the current template refers to the domain for the asg_eff template. Is this the same domain or not? How can this domain be more than one entity? Change name and update cardinality in template. For example representing_effectivity_domain


Open issue Issue: DNV-19 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 22 One major_technical issue and three minor_technical ones are open against the capability.


Open issue Issue: DNV-20 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 24 No purpose clause is present. Domain should be better explained. Description specify effectivity domain as an instance of a PLCS entity type, but template allows more than one entity type. Can domain be more than one entity?


Open issue Issue: DNV-21 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 25 No restrictions are defined, see 24.


Open issue Issue: DNV-22 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 36 I cannot find Effectivity_domain in RDL


Open issue Issue: DNV-23 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 51 The cardinality of the domain_items should be explained. Is it one or more? And if the latter, how can several entities define a domain?


Open issue Issue: DNV-24 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 65 Cannot find the plcs_registerd.owl file. Neither can I find a class called "Effectivity_domain"


Open issue Issue: DNV-25 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 88 No uniqueness constrain is defined. This is required. Especially to identify the domain entities. What does it mean if more than one domain entity is specified?


Open issue Issue: DNV-26 by David Skogan, DNV (2007-11-30) major_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Issue file: D:\users\rbn\projects\010937_DNV_dexlib\docs\review\checklists_12_07\all_template_issues.xls Template: assigning_domain_specific_effectivity Check list clause: 52b effectivity_ecl_id and should be optional and have default set to "urn:plcs_rdl_std".