Template:— assigning_contract (asg_ctr)
Capability:representing_contract		 Date: 2008/02/01 17:30:12
Revision: 1.20
CoverContentsDescriptionModel diags.Input params.Ref. params.Instantiation pathInstance diags.CharacterizationsIssuesin situ

Issue raised against: assigning_contract

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: TRO-1 by trisharollo (01-0ct-2007) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The template should allow for organization names as well as codes
Comment: ( )
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-09)
Added to possible classes of cnt_org_id_class_name

Closed issue Issue: DNV-3 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: General#7 The checklist requires files to be in the dvlp directory. This seems systematically not to be the case. Is the checklist wrong?
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-16)
Added the model diagrams
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-18)
Added remaining model diagram masters

Closed issue Issue: DNV-4 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: XML#9 i) 3. sentence in the Description says "contact" instead of "contract". ii) Characterization Assigning classifications: "A contract be classified" is lacking part of its verb.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-16)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: DNV-5 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: XML#14 The "Type" of the parameters could be hyperlinked.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-18)
Other templates do not have TYPE hyper linked so feel it would be incorrect to do this one and do not feel it can be cost justified to amend all templates as the benefit is negligible.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-6 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Cover#19 Names of reviewers are only given as company names.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-16)
Acceptable

Closed issue Issue: DNV-7 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Cover#20 Current status is "in_model_review"
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-18)
status changed

Closed issue Issue: DNV-8 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Description#24 The description states that purpose and kind of contract "shall" be given, however, they are optional in the Express-G diagram. The description does not mention that date and person may be assigned to Contract_assignment.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-18)
description changed

Closed issue Issue: DNV-9 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Model diagram#26 It does in fact, but it uses the deprecated template assigning_business_specific_reference_data instead of the recommended assiging_reference_data.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
amended

Closed issue Issue: DNV-10 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: Model diagram#29 Only the mandatory attributes are shown (in blue).
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
Other templates do not have optional attributes shown (in blue). so feel it would be incorrect to do this one and do not feel it can be cost justified to amend all templates as the benefit is negligible.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-11 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Model diagram#43 Hmm, there is only one blue bordered rectangle for this template. In the other figures its entities are listed explicitly.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
both template (full and abbreviated) in figure. Template figures do not explicitly list all entities.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-12 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: Input parameters#50 Yes and no: only the mandatory ones are listed, and only the mandatory ones are in the diagram * which seems wrong.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
Other templates do not have optional attributes in the parameter list so feel it would be incorrect to do this one and do not feel it can be cost justified to amend all templates as the benefit is negligible.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-13 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Reference parameters#57 Shouldn't the definition of the type be consistent with how it is defined in the input parameter section. I would have expected the following: contract(Type='ENTITY(Contract)'))
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-16)
You can only assign a reference parameter to an entity

Closed issue Issue: DNV-14 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: Instantiation path#59 Only the mandatory entities are instantiated, not the optional ones.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
Other templates do not have optional attributes shown so feel it would be incorrect to do this one and do not feel it can be cost justified to amend all templates as the benefit is negligible.

Closed issue Issue: DNV-15 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#70 Part_version should be marked with a grey area.
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
amended

Closed issue Issue: DNV-16 by , (2007-8-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Reject. Status: closed

Check list clause: Instance diagrams#73 A couple use urn:plcs:rdl:std * maybe this is correct here?
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
urn:plcs:rdl:std is valid in this case

Closed issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (07-11-13) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

There is a typo in the path %^contract_assgn = Contract_assignment% - Should be: %^contract_assgn = Contract_assignment%
Comment: (Rob Bodington 07-11-13)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: RBN-2 by Rob Bodington (08-01-16) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The characterizations how assigning_calendar date - this should be assigning_time
Comment: (Trisha Rollo 08-01-21)
amended

Closed issue Issue: RBN-3 by Rob Bodington (08-01-22) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

There should be a uniqueness constraint on contract
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-01-22)
Added

Closed issue Issue: RBN-4 by Rob Bodington (08-03-08) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The EXPRESS-G shows cnt_org_id_class_name defaulting to Organization_identifier - this is incorrect The default should not be shown.
Comment: (Rob Bodington 08-03-08)
Corrected