Capability (C096):— representing_value_with_unit Date: 2007/08/09 14:58:29
Revision: 1.22
CoverContentsIntro.Overview Info. modelTemplatesIssues

Issue raised against: representing_value_with_unit

OTHER issues

Open issue Issue: TJT-1 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

This capability has no section on dependent capabilities or reference data. Reference data is mentioned in a number of places in the capability, but there is no section listing the reference data developed. The section on reference data should be siginificant since this capability deals with units and measures. If none are defined for this capability, then "None defined" should be entered into that section.

Open issue Issue: TJT-2 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Centimetre appears to be missing from the reference data (plcs-proposed).

Open issue Issue: TJT-3 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

There is a useful discussion on units within the capability. It should be explicitly stated when the si_unit.boolean attribute should be set to true (.T.). Also, note, the value of the si_unit.boolean attribute would now appear to be somewhat defunct or more subjective given that combining the EXPRESS unit and measure subtypes, and the associated rules for dimensional exponents have been deprecated.

Open issue Issue: TJT-4 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

This capability has no entities defined within the entity usage section. It would seem more consistent if it listed those entities found within the information model overview section.

Open issue Issue: TJT-5 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Currently an error is reported when selecting the Express menu item option. This is probably a side effect of the issue identified in TJT-4.

Open issue Issue: TJT-6 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

When selecting the Express Defs menu item option, the page informs the reader that this capability uses all of AP239, which is clearly incorrect. This is probably a side effect of the issue identified in TJT-4.

Open issue Issue: TJT-7 by Tim Turner on behalf of UK MoD TES/ILS and Eng Pol under UK_Defence Development Programme. (06-12-05) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Each template repeats the description of the input parameter "si_unit" and states that a Part 11 ([is] a STEP file) - but should read Part 21 (a STEP file).

GENERAL issues

Closed issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (06-01-21) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Count reference parameter is missing from template representing-count
Comment: (Peter Bergstrom 06-01-21)
Corrected

Closed issue Issue: RBN-2 by Rob Bodington (07-08-09) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

Moved template representing_value_with_unit_explicit to NDLO/templates