Capability (C007):— representing_state_type Date: 2008/01/28 13:34:35
Revision: 1.14
CoverContentsIntro.Overview Info. modelTemplatesCapabilities.Issues

Issue raised against: representing_state_type

OTHER issues

Open issue Issue: SMB-1 by Sean Barker (2004-6-17) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

A description of the use of Applied_state_defintion_assignment.role is needed.
Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 2007-05-02)
I've adressed this in the template 'assigning_state_type'. However, it still remains to be dealt with in the capability.

Open issue Issue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (04-08-20) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

How is the probability of a state represented? The suggestion is to create a property associated with the state that is the probability of the occurrence of the state.
Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 2007-05-02)
Then it should be a property assigend to the Applied_state_definition_assignment, so that the same state definition kan have different probabilities in different contexts.

Open issue Issue: NN-1 by Nigel Newling (05-11-17) editorial issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

Figure 1 is difficult to read.

Open issue Issue: RBN-3 by Rob Bodington (06-06-15) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

The business overview should provide some examples of state defnitions, such as failure states The capability should provide an ExpressG diagram that gives an overview of the express constructs. It should not refer to the PLCS module

Open issue Issue: RBN-4 by Rob Bodington (06-06-15) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

The diagrams should use templates

Open issue Issue: RBN-5 by Rob Bodington (06-06-15) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: open

The capability should explain how reference data is used to provide the state definitions and how they should be extended. It should describe the top level of the reference data that is applicable to state definitions. E.g. State_of_functional_object State_of_physical_object etc

OTHER issues

Closed issue Issue: RBN-2 by Rob Bodington (06-06-15) minor_technical issue
Resolution: Accept. Status: closed

The capability does not contain any templates - it should at least have templates for: applied_state_definition. This should follow the pattern of the assignment templates in representing_state_observed. It should also have a reference parameter on state_definition so that it can be related to state_observed.
Comment: (Leif Gyllstrom 2007-05-02)
Template 'assigning_state_type' added and ready for review.